If you need instructions to find it or use it, it’s not intuitive.
Findable refers to course navigation: content and activities are easy to find; usable refers to ease-of-use: once found, content and activities are easy to use. The experience of navigating through an online course, or of engaging in an online activity, should be intuitive for learners. The design of the interface, and the underlying technology, should be invisible.
What happens when it isn't? When it intrudes itself on a learner's consciousness, it can become a distraction and get in the way of learning (it does this by directing learners away from the learning material and towards the technology).
It can also become more than a distraction. As Norman says, "Confuse or frustrate the person who is using the product, and negative emotions result" (p. 37). Negative emotions mean unhappy learners, and unhappy learners are not effective learners:
Students who are anxious, angry, or depressed don't learn; people who are caught in these states do not take in information efficiently or deal with it well.(Goleman, Emotional Intelligence, p. 183)
Our goal, then, is to create intuitive online experiences, and satisfied/happy learners. Dubbing this his "first law of usability," Krug (2006) stresses the importance of effortless user experiences:
Don't make me think! I've been telling people for years that this is my first law of usability.... It means that as far as is humanly possible, when I look at a web page it should be self-evident. Obvious. Self-explanatory.(Don't Make Me Think, p. 11)
So, how do we design for this kind of efficiency and effortlessness? The following tips from experts like Steve Krug (2006) and Janice Redish (2007) are a great place to start:
Let’s say that you’ve tried your best to implement these guidelines in your course. How do you ACTUALLY know whether something is easy to find and easy to use? "Well, that's easy," you might say, "if it's easy to find and easy to use for me, then it should be easy to find and easy to use for our learners, right?" Not so fast. Jakob Nielsen (2006) offers some useful perspective on this kind of reasoning:
One of usability's most hard-earned lessons is that "you are not the user." If you work on a development project, you're atypical by definition. Design to optimize the user experience for outsiders, not insiders.(Growing a Business Website: Fix the Basics First)
As course authors, designers, and developers, our experience with an online course into which we may have invested dozens, or perhaps even hundreds, of hours, is necessarily going to be different from that of our learners. We have what Nielsen calls "elite experience" (or, more charmingly, "bubble vapour"). Contrast that with the online behaviour of a typical Millennial student:
We frequently see Millennial users getting stumped in usability testing when they encounter difficult user interfaces. Their interactions tend to be fast-paced. Because they spend less time on any given page, Millennials are more likely to make errors, and they read even less [online] than the average user (which is already very little).(Meyer, Millennials as Digital Natives: Myths and Realities, 2016)
We are indeed NOT our users. According to Nielsen, the best antidote to "elite experience" is user testing.
User testing is a qualitative methodology based on observation. We're not going to go into any detail here about how to conduct user testing sessions — either one of Steve Krug's books on the subject (see References) provides a great overview of what user testing is, and how to do it:
We will, however offer a quick overview. In short,
Do take notes. It's amazing how much you will learn. Here's an example:
Figure 1. Reprinted from “Here’s Why! The Quebec Bridge Collapse” by. J. Vale and D. Harder, 2013, PD 22.
Copyright 2013 by J. Vale, D. Harder and University of Waterloo.
In a series of usability tests, we discovered that the majority of users (4 out of 6) did not understand that the image on the left was a video icon; they thought it was a static image and so did not click it to watch the video. Video is costly to produce; it is important to ensure, as far as possible, that video icons are, to use Krug's words, ". . . self-evident. Obvious. Self-explanatory." After all, we want learners to click them! The "after" picture shows the redesigned icon, which takes advantage of YouTube's familiar 'play' arrow in the centre of the icon. Problem solved.
Usability testing sounds like a good idea, but, given that tests are conducted one user at a time, they can also be time-consuming. "Wouldn't a survey do?" you wonder. It's true that surveys are much more time-efficient — you can collect many more responses in a given time frame than is possible with usability testing, which typically requires an hour per participant. However, Norman (2004) explains why this kind of instrument is not likely to produce the best data about what learners 'do' online:
Focus groups, questionnaires, and surveys are poor tools for learning about behavior, for they are divorced from actual use. Most behavior is subconscious and what people actually do can be quite different from what they think they do.(Norman, Emotional Design, p. 81-2)
The magic, as they say, is in the observation.